|THAT SECULAR WORM OF INFIDELITY!
In Edwards v Aguillard (1987), the US Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to require educators to teach creationism alongside evolution; they found it a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. [ http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/edwards-v-aguillard.html ]
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel for the Law Center, commented, "What is clear from this decision is that our present Establishment Clause jurisprudence, as several Supreme Court justices have noted, is in hopeless disarray and in need of substantial revision. In his opinion the judge bemoaned that the school district 'deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.' In this respect, he was correct. This case should have never made it into a federal courthouse. The Founders of this country would be astonished at the thought that this simple curriculum change 'established religion' in violation of the Constitution that they drafted."
[http://www.thomasmore.org/qry/page.taf?id=19&_function=detail&sbtblct_uid1=80&_nc=f08261b4278213463f5127e0d06eddc8 ] (emphasis added)
Several Supreme Court justices have openly criticized the way in which this body of constitutional law has developed. For example, Justice Thomas stated in his concurring opinion in the pledge of allegiance case, "Our jurisprudential confusion has led to results that can only be described as silly." In Edwards v. Aguillard, a case relied upon by the district court in which the Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional to teach creationism alongside evolution, Justice Scalia criticized the Court's "embarrassing Establishment Clause jurisprudence." In a school prayer case, then Justice Rehnquist noted, "It is impossible to build sound constitutional doctrine upon a mistaken understanding of constitutional history, but unfortunately the Establishment Clause has been expressly freighted with Jefferson's misleading metaphor for nearly 40 years." Justice Rehnquist is referring to the metaphor of the wall of separation between church and state.
(Note Hisways' THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE-TYRANNY ! )
Constitutional Amendment - Trinitarian Christian Bible and Prayer Amendment
"Amends the Federal Constitution to prohibit the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal district courts from exercising jurisdiction over any matter in which relief is sought against an element of Federal, State, or local government", schools "or officer of such government" who acknowledges America's default religion i.e. Trinitarian Christianity or who uses or studies the Trinitarian Christian Bible and Christian Prayer in government schools. Government schools shall require a signed Parental Opt-In Form and a signed survey/questionnaire to determine the depth of the basic doctrines of theology, void of denominational distinctives, suitable for their child's age.
"Prohibits a court of the United States from relying upon any law, policy, or other action of a foreign state or international organization in interpreting and applying the Constitution, other than the constitutional law and English common law."
"Provides that any Federal court decision relating to an issue removed from Federal jurisdiction by this Act is not binding precedent on State courts."
"Provides that any Supreme Court justice or Federal court judge who exceeds the jurisdictional limitations of this Act shall be deemed to have committed an offense for which the justice or judge may be removed, and to have violated the standard of good behavior required of Article III judges by the Constitution."
|PAGE PATH: || Partially Mobile ready. || Published: 08/08/08 |||