I.  The 'Dark Ages' of SCOTUS and The RAC Index Defined.

SCOTUS Failures by The RAC Index Template.    

The RAC Index template is a single acrostic formed by the letters from the full title of the template:

RIGHTEOUSLY  AGGRESSIVE  CONSTITUTIONIST  ["RAC"] INDEX ... which is a

list of 55 Principles of Freedoms (Ref. link: 55 Freedoms Tables.) as listed by W. Cleon Skousen in his book  "The 5000 Year Leap, Principles of Freedom 101"  published by: National Center for Constitutional Studies, NCCS  ©1991, 2007  

• Every executive order, judicial decree, bureaucratic mandate, law, treaty or amendment can be RAC Indexed for superior scrutiny for preserving Constitutional authority.
• How does "The RAC Index" work?  When the law or decision violates the Principles of Freedom of the left column, it turns toward tyranny.  When the decision violates the Principles of Religion of the right column, it turns toward anarchy.
• If the reading of the document produces violation(s) on the left or right columns then a simple summation will show a negative number or "grade", where any one negative is cause to declare it invalid and unconstitutional.
• The RAC Index as applied to the following SCOTUS cases primarily avoids the opinions of legal experts in order to demonstrate the failure to simply honor the other equally valuable freedoms.
•  This RAC Index link explains and defines the example above using The "UN Convention on the Rights of the Child" Treaty (CRC) where it produced a whopping -22 infractions of Constitutional freedoms!  

II.  In 1947 (Everson), SCOTUS FAILs The RAC Index Test. 

SCOTUS Failure # 1. by The RAC Index Test. for 1947 EVERSON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF EWING TP., 330 U.S. 1.

Abstract:  
'A New Jersey statute authorizes its local school districts to make rules and contracts for the transportation of children to and from schools.  The appellee, a township board of education, acting pursuant to this statute authorized reimbursement to parents of money expended by them for the bus transportation of their children on regular busses operated by the public transportation system.'

• The method to analyze the concurring opinion consists of a reading and rebutting the central theme and applying a "grade" of the infringements of Principles of Freedoms i.e. tyranny or by the infringements of Principles of Religion i.e. anarchy .
• "Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court."  and his central theme paragraph is rebutted with the insertion of green text and two carriage returns below:

'The only contention here is that the State statute and the resolution, in so far as they authorized reimbursement to parents of children attending parochial schools, violate the Federal Constitution in these two respects, which to some extent, overlap.  
First. They authorize the State to take by taxation the private property of some and bestow it upon others, to be used for their own private purposes. This, it is alleged violates the due process clause of the F[o]urteenth Amendment.'   [To disambiguate "their own private purposes" means their own private purchases which by this assumption makes every socialist government handout a violation of the 14th amendment e.g. the GI Bill, food stamps, transportation and housing vouchers to name a few.  However, in this case the "private purpose" i.e. private purchase was for public transportation to facilitate the duty of parents to provide for their child's education and direct enforcement of anti Tyranny Freedom Principle # 23.]

'Second. The statute and the resolution forced inhabitants to pay taxes to help support and maintain schools which are dedicated to, and which regularly teach, the Catholic Faith. This is alleged to be a use of State power to support church schools contrary to the prohibition of the First Amendment which the Fourteenth Amendment made applicable to the states.'  [To disambiguate the "dedicated to ... Catholic Faith" is a broad jump to failure.  Consider his logic applied to the assumption that people who get food stamps all support the "vegan stores belief" or the "organic stores belief" and that that "faith" should disqualify the food stamp program by the 14th Amendment!  Or that all GI Bill recipients support the belief in the institution of higher education and that that "faith" should disqualify the GI Bill program.]

• The following numbers indicate the Principles of Freedom violations where each number has a corresponding freedom from the Table of Freedoms (RAC Index).  On the left side of the Table are the anti Tyranny freedoms and on the right side of the Table are the anti Anarchy freedoms.
  Tyranny: [ -2(virtue+morality), -4(religion+govt), -14(where family is property), -15(personal+community prosperity), -20(majority+minority), -21(local self-govt.), -22(law), -23(free education), -26(family), (Tyranny ct. 9 ea.)]  and
  Anarchy: [ -2(local self-govt.), -4(property), -5(free choices), -6(free conscience), -10(free assembly), -22(free association), (Anarchy ct. 6 ea.) ]
  Total:  "Tyranny" (9 ea.) + "Anarchy" (6 ea.) = -15.  At least fifteen reasons for nullifying or reversing Everson v Board of Education.   Mr Black's prejudice is very apparant.  "The king has no clothes."

• THEREFORE to correct SCOTUS' religious anarchy contact your State representative where "We, The People" require a Religious Freedom Bill of Nullification that reestablishes our Founding Fathers' compact for church and state schools, namely: 

  The list of Five "Fundamental Judeo-Christian Points To Be Taught in the Schools."  ( Five Points Taught in Schools:  List 1 short, List 2 explained,  )       

III.  In 1948 (McCollum), SCOTUS FAILs The RAC Index Test.

SCOTUS Failure II.  by The RAC Index Test.   In  1948, McCOLLUM V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 71, 333 U.S. 203 (1948) 333 U.S. 203, CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, ILL, et al.

  (In 1940, local Jewish, Roman Catholic, and some Protestant groups formed the Champaign (IL) Council on Religious Education.  The group, with the cooperation of the Champaign Board of Education, offered voluntary classes in religion to public school students.  The program was called Released Time. (Released Time ) The classes were held during the school day and those children not participating were forced to go elsewhere in the school to pursue secular studies.  In order to participate, a student needed to have a permission slip signed by his parents.) [1.]

In the 6th paragraph of McCollum, SCOTUS writes . . .

"And it falls squarely under the ban of the First Amendment (made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth)  as we interpreted it in Everson v. Board of Education, [330 U.S. 1].  There we said: 'Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church.  Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. [6]  Neither can force or influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.   No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or nonattendance.  No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. [7]  Neither a state nor [333 U.S. 203 , 211]  the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups, and vice versa.   In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State." Id., at pages 15, 16 of 330 U.S., at page 511 of 67 S.Ct. "

• The following numbers indicate the Principles of Freedom violations where each number has a corresponding freedom from the Table of Freedoms (RAC Index).
  Tyranny: [ -2(virtue+ morality), -4(religion+ govt), -14(where family is property), -15(personal+ community prosperity), -20(majority+ minority), -21(local self-govt.), -22(law), -23(free education), -26(family),] and
  Anarchy: [ -2(local self-govt.), -4(property), -5(free choices), -6(free conscience), -10(free assembly), -22(free association), ]
  Total:  "T's" (9) and "A's" (6) = -15.  At least fifteen reasons for nullifying McCollum v Board of Education Champaign, IL.   Mr Black's prejudice is still apparant.

1. And there is no free expression of the COMMUNITY as reflected in the desires of multiple faiths. 
2. THEREFORE to correct SCOTUS' religious anarchy contact your State representative where "We, The People" require a Religious Freedom Bill of Nullification that reestablishes our Founding Fathers' compact for church and state schools, namely: 

   The list of Five "Fundamental Judeo-Christian Points To Be Taught in the Schools."  (Five Points Taught in Schools:  ) 

IV.  In 1962 (Engel v Vitale), SCOTUS FAILs The RAC Index Test.

SCOTUS Failure # lll.   by The RAC Index Test.  for   1962, ENGEL V. VITALE, 370 U.S. 421 (1962) 

Although Justice Black delivered the opinion of the court it is not necessary to rebut his complete decision.  It is sufficient to logically and constitutionally rebut the two footnoted passages below which are from summaries of this case.  (Red high-lighting in quote below by ed.)

U.S. Supreme Court struck down school prayer, the first decision in which the courts re-interpreted the phrase "separation of church and state." After 170 years, the Court decided that "church" would no longer mean a "federal denomination" but would instead mean a "religious activity in public."  (The Court ruled that requiring students to recite the prayer is unconstitutional.  Significance: This case was one of the first in a series of cases in which a variety of religious activities were found to violate the Establishment Clause.  Neither the voluntary nature of school prayers nor their nondenominational character protected them from violating the Establishment Clause.)[2.]
 In other words SCOTUS went nuts.  THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE.

Because of the prohibition of the First Amendment against the enactment of any law "respecting an establishment of religion," which is made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, state officials may not compose an official state prayer and require that it be recited in the public schools of the State at the beginning of each school day - even if the prayer is denominationally neutral and pupils who wish to do so may remain silent or be excused from the room while the prayer is being recited. Pp. 422-436.[3.]

AND THERE IS NO FREE EXPRESSION: of the student, of the parent, of the school board, city, county or state.  There is no free expression of the taxpayers.  When did the community write a LAW giving up its rights to direct public education?  ( This was another case that used the anti slavery principles of the 14th Amendment to force the states to be bound by the very amendments that were designed to bind the feds.)

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787  states:  Article 3 Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.
  So here is the original intent of the Founders compact for religion in schools and which had to comply with Article 3 of The Northwest Ordinance.  

The list of Five "Fundamental Judeo-Christian Points To Be Taught in the Schools." , The Founders' compact, from "The 5000 Year Leap, Principles of Freedom 101" by W. Cleon Skousen,  [ pgs. 77, 78 ].
  1.  There exists a Creator who made all things, and mankind should recognize and worship him.
  2.  The Creator has revealed a moral code of behavior for happy living which distinguishes right from wrong.
  3.  The Creator holds mankind responsible for the way they treat each other.
  4.  All mankind live beyond this life.
  5.  In the next life mankind are judged for their conduct in this one.
[This was not an establishment of religion nor denomination.  The Supreme Court's separation of church and state is a scam where a govt. employee's occupation is valued higher than their personhood.  The Supreme Court via Public Schools have become a jackhammer to our national foundations of faith and culture, children and families.  The Supreme Court has been hammering at them for 65 years. ] 

[Our Founding Fathers believed The Bible to be the inerrant, infallible, absolutely true, Holy Spirit inspired Word of The Living God proven by the life, death, burial and ressurection of Jesus The Messiah.  We know this by their sacred honor, The Declaration of Independence and their trial by fire.]

[America is morally compromised.  We will not get America back until we get our culture back.  We will not get our culture back until we get our religion back.  We will not get our religion back until we get our public schools back.  We will not get our public schools  back until we get the Bible back into the curriculum.  So, we can make America moral again, after we make our culture moral again, after we make our religion moral again, after we make our public schools moral again, after we make our families and children moral again, after we make the curriculum moral again with the Bible.  The "6" moral institutions listed are not being criticized except that they all are failures due to SCOTUS' failures of justice and righteousness.  We will not get the Bible back until we rewrite  i.e. nullify the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions that have enslaved the People, enslaved the States and abused the Constitution.  Let us make it our prayer that our religion be set free.]

THEREFORE to correct SCOTUS' religious anarchy tell your State Legislator that "We, The People" need 50 States' Bills of Nullification like a Religious Freedom and Restoration Bill that reestablishes our Founding Fathers compact for church and state, namely: 

The Five "Fundamental Judeo-Christian Points To Be Taught in the Schools."  See Topic VI., slide # 6 short explainer

V.  In 1963 (Murray v Curlet and Abington v Shempp) SCOTUS FAILs The RAC Index Test.

SCOTUS Failure V. !    The 5^th of 5 Major Compounded Errors Causing The Failure of Public Education.

1963, MURRAY V. CURLETT and ABINGTON V. SCHEMPP.  The U.S. Supreme Court struck down Bible reading and recitation of the Lord's Prayer, based on the same re-interpretation of "church and state" and the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. (Both cases involved the reading of Bible passages prior to class in public schools. Schempp challenged a Pennsylvania law that stated that, "at least ten verses from the Holy Bible shall be read, without comment, at the opening of each public school day.  Any child shall be excused from such Bible reading, or attending such Bible reading, upon written request of his parent or guardian." This was disallowed by a federal district court.  Murray challenged the requirement of the Baltimore school board that the Lord's Prayer be recited prior to the beginning of the day's classes. This was upheld by both a state court and the Maryland Court of Appeals.)[3.]  

There is NO evidence of an establishment of religion here - there are at least 20 DIFFERENT denominations in Maryland that use the Bible.  There is no free expression for the student, parent, school board, city, county or state.  THERE IS NO FREE EXPRESSION OF THE TAXPAYERS.  THERE IS NO FREE EXPRESSION OF THE CITIZENS OF THE COMMUNITY.

Congress was not involved in this case.  There is no federal law in this case.  There is no establishment of government denomination or religion in this case because:

1. Congress did not pass a law of religion.  There is no federal law of establishment.
2. The State did not pass a law of religion.  There is no state law of establishment.
3. There are no licenses, bureaucracies or assigned agencies of religious establishment.
4. There are no government officers of religion: elected, unelected, appointed or otherwise designated.
5. There are no documents of establishment e.g. articles of incorporation bylaws, declared doctrine(s) of faith, mission statement(s) or designated departments of religion.  
6. There are no established government religious copyrights, trademarks, or agency web sites.
7. Where is The Federal Department of Religion?  Where is The Federal Department of Religion Office?
8. And where are The States' Department of Religion?  Where are The States' Department of Religion Officers?  The Budgets?  The payrolls?  The expenses?
9. What is the NAME of the government established religion?  What religion is it?  What denomination is it?  What sect is it?
10.   THERE IS absolutely NO evidence of establishment.
11. NO FREE EXPRESSION: of the student, of the parent, of the school board, city, county or state.  There is no free expression of the taxpayers.  When did the community write a LAW giving up its rights to direct public education?

Here is the original intent of the Founders which had to comply with The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 which stated:  

The list of Five "Fundamental Judeo-Christian Points To Be Taught in the Schools." , The Founders' compact, from "The 5000 Year Leap, Principles of Freedom 101" by W. Cleon Skousen,  [ pgs. 77, 78 ] - edits and references by rek 8/11/09
  1. ___ There exists a Creator who made all things, and mankind should recognize and worship him.
  2. ___ The Creator has revealed a moral code of behavior for happy living which distinguishes right from wrong.
  3. ___ The Creator holds mankind responsible for the way they treat each other.
  4. ___ All mankind live beyond this life.
  5. ___ In the next life mankind are judged for their conduct in this one.
[This was not an establishment of religion nor denomination.  The Supreme Court's separation of church and state is a scam where a govt employee's occupation is valued higher than their personhood.  The Supreme Court via Public Schools have become a jackhammer to our national foundations of faith and culture; children and families.  The Supreme Court has been hammering at them for 65 years.]  

The reasonable summation of this analysis of religious decisions is that SCOTUS hates The USA's default religion; and, by the massive errors of interpretation also hates the 1st Amendment.

THEREFORE to correct SCOTUS' religious anarchy tell your State Legislator that "We, The People" need 50 States' Bills of Nullification like a Religious Freedom and Restoration Bill that reestablishes our Founding Fathers compact for church and state.

[back - (Pg Up)]  

VI.  The Five "Fundamental  Judeo-Christian Points To Be Taught in the Schools.",

What is the original intent of the Founders regarding religion and morality when they wrote the Northwest Ordinance?

 'Art. 3. Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.'

`On August 7, 1789, President George Washington signed the Northwest Ordinance of 1789 into law after the newly created U.S. Congress reaffirmed the Ordinance with slight modifications under the Constitution.  The Ordinance purported to be not merely legislation that could later be amended by Congress, but rather "the following articles shall be considered as Articles of compact between the original States and the people and states in the said territory, and forever remain unalterable, unless by common consent ...." [1] Wikipedia] ` ( Emboldments by Hisways.org )

This was not a government establishment of religion.  How could Congress encourage the new terrorities to educate in 'religion, morality and knowledge' if the expectation of every symbol and expression of religion by government is condemned as an establishment?

The list of Five "Fundamental Judeo-Christian Points To Be Taught in the Schools." i.e.  The Founders' compact, from "The 5000 Year Leap, Principles of Freedom 101" by W. Cleon Skousen,  [ pgs. 77, 78 ]- rek 8/11/09 .

  1.  There exists a Creator who made all things, and mankind should recognize and worship him.
  2.  The Creator has revealed a moral code of behavior for happy living which distinguishes right from wrong.
  3.  The Creator holds mankind responsible for the way they treat each other.
  4.  All mankind live beyond this life.
  5.  In the next life mankind are judged for their conduct in this one.  
[This was not an establishment of religion nor denomination.  The Supreme Court's separation of church and state is a scam where a govt employee's occupation is valued higher than their personhood.  The Supreme Court via Public Schools have become a jackhammer to our national foundations of faith and culture; children and families.  The Supreme Court has been hammering at them for 65 years.]_- 

The Congress was not involved in this case.  There is no federal law in this case.  There is no evidence of an establishment of religion in this case.  BUT THERE IS NO FREE EXPRESSION: of the student, of the parent, of the school board, city, county or state.  There is no free expression of the taxpayers.  When did the voting - tax payer community give up its rights to direct public education?  ( I think this is the first case that used the 14th Amendment to force the states to be bound by the very amendments that were designed to bind the feds.)

It has been said that the Three Phases of New Truth are: Ridicule, Outrage, and Self Evident ...  To some of us i.e."We, The People" have been in the 'Outrage' category over the total absence of "free expression" for most of our education! 

The Necessity For Nullification by the States.

• Bryan Fischer:   The solution to ... "nullification" ... "an obscure 18th century doctrine" of Thomas Jefferson;  ... "the states are under no obligation of any kind to submit to such abuses of power.  We must never forget that the central government is the creation of the states, not the other way round.  The states cautiously delegated certain prerogatives to the federal government for the sake of preserving the unity of the fledgling Union and strengthening its ability to defend us against foreign threats, but reserved every other right of action for themselves."  archive//www.afa.net/Blogs/
• SCOTUS Only ‘Assumes’ You Have 1st Amendment Rights via 14th Amendment by P.A. Madison on March 5th, 2007 (Opens a new window)
• Video: The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: A History was adopted on July 9, 1868.  Video by Institute For Justice . (Oct 11, 2011) (13 min. Opens YouTube video in new window.) The 14th Amendment protects 3 distinct interests of the citizens against state tyranny: 'due process', 'equal protection' and 'privilages or immunities - meaning rights of US citizens'.
• This site  acadianapatriots.ning.com/  has this video (3:44 m.): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuCaWYvpVZg  of teenagers asking values voters for a "Pristine Constitutional Republicracy".   See article on "How To Vote The American Way". 
• 10th Amendment/Nullification Movement  "The 10th Amendment Movement is an effort to push back against unconstitutional federal laws and regulations on a state level. The principle is known as “nullification,” and was advised by many prominent founders."
• STATE NULLIFICATION of Laws and Decrees via 10th AMENDMENT.   This trailer (2:34 m.) shows how the States have power available to confront the Feds. < busted link. >  .   (See also:  YouTube.com/TomWoodsTV's channel ; Ron Paul the "Extreme" Constitutionist (15 positions in an article with videos.)
• JURY NULLIFICATION of Laws: State and Federal .  https://conservapedia.com/Jury_nullification
• What does a "Pristine Constitutional Republicracy" look like?  (This web page is a book review with a short video that explains the first half of the book.)
• This site and link www.agendadocumentary.com has a video (6:41 m.) that documents the success of the 1963 Communist Goals for kidnapping America's public schools, children and families.  See the list here: (1963ComGoals.htm )  and their current agenda: (2009 Communist Party USA, Inc.).
• One of this site's videos (5:13 mim.) (https://www.adflegal.org/issues/religious-freedom/church) speaks to Pastors.      
  
• This site defends your religious freedoms from censure: https://www.adflegal.org/issues/religious-liberty .  See also: https://www.adflegal.org/issues/school
  
• Hisways.org/about/2004Judicial-Activism.html - a short list of judicial activism before 2004.
• The Federal Department of Education is an unconstitutional usurpation of power by the feds.  There is no Constitutional authority for regulating and controlling 50 states' education.
• A Sample Letter Of Nullification to encourage your state legislature. (TBA)
• Released Time Elective off-campus Bible studies for public school kids.   (GoodSearch)
  
• RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT?   The 2012 FL Constitution, Religious Freedom Amendment did not get the required 60% of the voting citizens.
• Hisways monthly eNewsLetter SignUp. Hisways USA, Inc. motto is: "Returning the Bible and Wisdom principles to our public school children under our 1st Amendment."
•  Repent .  "If my people ..."
  
  
  

The END of Part 3 of 3 and Copyrights.

 [ Back to the ChurchStateTyranny SYLLABUS page. ]

Recommended Slides, Research and References.

 OTHER Web Page Similar Links:

• (#1)  Link or bookmark this page:  https://hisways.org/about/ChurchStateTyranny/index.html. "Dual, Equal and Parallel Walls of Separation. (Part 1 of 3.)"
• (#2)  "The Egregious Religious Usurpations By The Supreme Court. (Part 2. of 3.)"  Slide Show #-2.  SCOTUS Fails! https://hisways.org/about/ChurchStateTyranny/SCOTUS-FAIL2.html  .  This is a slide show on SCOTUS' WORST FAILURES of religious justice.
• (#3)  "The Egregious Religious Usurpations By The Supreme Court. (Part 3. of 3.)"  Slide Show #-3.  SCOTUS Fails!  This is a slide show on SCOTUS' FAILURES of THE PRINCIPLES OF FREEDOM.  https://hisways.org/about/ChurchStateTyranny/SCOTUS-FAIL3.html  .

  
 RESEARCH:

• Video: The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: A History was adopted on July 9, 1868.  Video by Institute For Justice . (Oct 11, 2011) (13 min. Opens YouTube video in new window.)
• SCOTUS Only 'Assumes' You Have 1st Amendment Rights via 14th Amendment by P.A. Madison on March 5th, 2007 (Opens a new window to the article.)

 REFERENCE:

• Having problems with your religious rights and freedom of expression on campus?  See Religious Liberty Defenders ; (They will usually provide free representation.)
• Hisways monthly eNewsLetter SignUp. Hisways USA, Inc. motto is: "Returning the Bible and Wisdom principles to our public school children under our 1st Amendment."
•  Repent .
• The Original Separation of Church and State. Web page. (Opens a new window to 'Dual and Equal and Parallel Walls of Separation') by Hisways USA, Inc.