The "Separation of Church and State" Metaphor.  SCOTUS Failure #1.

Thomas Jefferson, who coined the metaphor "separation of church and state" in a Jan. 1, 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists also said just 16 months prior:

• "I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."  --Thomas Jefferson*  (*The famous quotation ... is from a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush of September 23, 1800. [ Jefferson Quotations  source] )  

The metaphor "separation of church and state" is not in the Constitution and is not in any official documents of the government.  SCOTUS used Jefferson's personal letter of encouragement to ignore "free expression" and wrangle outrageous decisions that are opposite to the original intent of The First Amendment and the intent of The Northwest Ordinance of 1789 which says in Article 3: 

• "Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.".  
• SCOTUS is still censoring and abusing the believers of America's default religion.

The metaphor was first used by SCOTUS in 1879 Reynolds v. US to stop polygamy in Utah.  It was unnecessary to use the metaphor for this purpose; because, from approximately 30 A.D.  to present, no mainline New Testament Christian denomination nor America's default religion has permitted polygamy.

In the light of Jefferson's attitude opposing every 'tyranny over the mind of man', it is justified to explore his metaphor as he understood the First Amendment's three-point intent.

In the prose of the next slide the word "religion" could have been used to generalize the Judeo-Christian "religious culture"; but it would not have satisfactorily transferred the right meaning since SCOTUS has redefined the word 'religion' in it's case law.  Instead, a truthful and specific New Testament title is used because without this distinction there would not be a Judeo-Christian culture.

The Original Intent of The First Amendment Clauses Are:

1. That state-tyranny is walled off from The USA's default religion i.e. The New Testament Trinitarian Christian faith;
2. That state-tyranny is walled off from my Trinitarian thoughts and speech;
3. That state-tyranny is walled off from my Trinitarian purposes and deeds;
4. That state-tyranny is walled off from all of my Trinitarian Christian paths as a:

child, student and parent,	Child, Student and Parent are subset people groups of "We, The People."
citizen and taxpayer	Citizen and Taxpayer are subset people groups of "We, The People."
soldier, teacher and politician	Soldier, Teacher and Politician are employment service labels.
all other vocation and occupation labels ...	are still only employment service labels.

The unalienable liberties of God were given to "We, The People" as human beings; not as human doings.  As spiritual beings, not as labels, employees or slaves of the government.

Where Does the "free exercise" Clause Belong? 

    Therefore...

•  I. Before my foot strikes a path, the 'Wall of Separation' ("freedom of religion" clause where "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion") is immediately erected PARALLEL to my path on one side; and that, 
• II. Immediately the other PARALLEL 'Wall of Separation' (where Congress shall not "prohibit the free expression thereof" (ref.)) is erected on the other side of my path; so that,

• 

  State-Tyranny is COMPLETELY WALLED OFF from my i.e. "We, The People's"  TRINITARIAN  CHRISTIAN  PATH  on or off state property!

  

• THEREFORE, the correct interpretation requires the DUAL and EQUAL and PARALLEL WALLS of separation of church and state, because it is "We, The People", not "we, the occupation", not "we, the slave of the state school".
• Therefore to correct SCOTUS' religious anarchy and chaos write a letter to your Congressman and/or State Legislator and ask him how to 'check' and 'balance' SCOTUS; or, how can they require SCOTUS to use the 3 point freedom of religion test above. 

Copyrights.